Zoe Keating’s Experience Shows Us Why YouTube’ Attitudes To Its Creators Must Change

It is easy to think of the internet as a mature medium, especially for those who were born into the internet era. However we are still at the earliest of stages. We are where radio was in the 1930’s and where TV was in the 1950’s: the first signs of the future markets are in place but the real maturation is yet to come. The greats of those early days, the Marconis and the RCAs, are now long gone but at the time they looked like they would rule forever. A similar long view should be taken to the internet. The dominant powers of the web (YouTube, Google search, Amazon, Facebook) may appear to have unassailable market leads but their time will come. Using more recent history, there was a time when AOL and MySpace looked irreplaceable. So why does all this matter to YouTube? The problem with absolute power is that it corrupts absolutely. YouTube, like those other dominant powers, has fallen victim to hubris. It is behaving like the unregulated de facto monopoly that it is. And in doing so it is taking its creators for granted. Right now that is bad for creators. Soon it may be bad for YouTube too. It Is Time For YouTube To Reassess It s Relationship With Content Creators Online video is truly coming of age. YouTube was one of the ice breakers and remains one the very biggest web destinations but the world is changing. YouTube has changed too of course, migrating skate boarding dogs, through music video to fostering a generation of YouTube stars like PewDiePie, Zoella and Smosh. But just as YouTube had to reinvent itself in the wake of the mid form revolution driven by Hulu et al so the time has come for another reinvention, but this one requires a change in business practices rather than product innovation. Most crucially YouTube needs to reassess its relationships with content creators and owners. When the first YouTube stars started to rise to prominence YouTube was almost positioned as a benefactor, giving the gift of a platform for these people to become stars. But now, a few years on, with millions of subscribers each, these stars are beginning to understand their real potential. In just the same way that a traditional TV star does not feel a debt of gratitude or a commitment to life long servitude to the TV channel that broke him or her, so YouTube stars are now beginning to reassess their options. The online video landscape though is dramatically less competitive than the TV landscape so options are limited. But where there is demand for change and no monopoly of supply of content, change will come. This is the context into which new video service Vessel has launched, offering YouTube stars cold hard cash payments and significantly bigger revenue shares, in return for giving just a few days of exclusivity. Be sure that few days window will change, but for now it is a low risk, high gain option for YouTube stars. Expect plenty more to follow Vessel’s lead. YouTube Is Abusing Its Position Of Absolute Power That should be where the story ends, well starts. But because the dominant internet companies are not subject to the same level of regulation as traditional companies they are able to abuse their power in order to try to maintain their strangle hold. YouTube found itself subject to extensive ire when it tried to foist a hugely restrictive contract on indie labels for its then forthcoming YouTube Music Key service. The indie sector was eventually able, via its licensing arm Merlin, to secure more favourable terms, but the same contract remains on the table for individual creators. Zoe Keating, an artist who sets the gold standard for DIY artists, has been a vocal advocate for YouTube channels as a revenue source. But now YouTube is trying to strong-arm her into signing what looks pretty much like that same original Music Key contract. Their demands include an effective Most Favoured Nation clause whereby anytime she uploads any music to the web she must upload it also to YouTube at exactly the same time. The contract also states a five year period and that failure to sign the contract will result in YouTube blocking both her channel and Keating’s ability (via Content ID) to get revenue from her own music uploaded without permission by others. The implications are:

  • Music must always be available free on YouTube first on the web
  • Artists must take a 5 year bet on streaming, even though there are massive doubts about its sustainability for artists

But it is the Content ID clause that is most nefarious. Content ID is not an added value service YouTube provides to content owners, it is the obligation of a responsible partner designed to help content creators protect their intellectual property. YouTube implemented Content ID in response to rights owners, labels in particular, who were unhappy about their content being uploaded by users without their permission. YouTube’s willingness to use Content ID as a contractual lever betrays a blatant disregard for copyright. Asymmetrical Conflict Zoe Keating is a rare talent and also a rare voice. She is willing to expose her entire digital music commercial life in a way very few artists are willing to. She is standing up to YouTube in a David and Goliath like manner but the deck is stacked against her because YouTube is able to abuse its de facto monopolistic position without any fear of regulatory intervention. If they get their way with independent music creators, expect them to take the exact same approach to other independent video creators in a bid to neuter the threat from disruptive new entrants like Vessel.  Rather than simply try to future proof itself against the emerging competition YouTube should focus on trying to be the best possible place for its creators to be to build prosperous careers. Instead it is trying to lock them in like prison inmates. Ultimately though this sort of action from YouTube reveals strategic hubris, arrogance and complacency. All of which are classic signs of an incumbent company teetering on the brink of disruption. As the Enron experience showed us, no company is too big to fail. And as my former colleague Michael Gartenberg used to say ‘cemeteries are full of irreplaceable people’.

47 thoughts on “Zoe Keating’s Experience Shows Us Why YouTube’ Attitudes To Its Creators Must Change

  1. My 14 year old son spends more time watching his favorite on YouTube than television. I would suspect that his loyalties lie more with the artists than the channel and if they moved somewhere else, so would he.

  2. Great! And I’m on your side, “YouTube reveals strategic hubris, arrogance and complacency. All of which are classic signs of an incumbent company teetering on the brink of disruption.” Fact!

  3. Pingback: Welcome To The Content App Era | JonMaples.com

  4. “Content ID is not an added value service YouTube provides to content owners, it is the obligation of a responsible partner”

    I think this is a very important point. Content ID is an obligation, not a privilege to be paid for by the artist. The underlying software compensation infrastructure in the music industry needs more work (ie. standardization and buy-in) by parties other than Google to become functional and trusted by makers. Content ID is very cool. It ties authorship/ownership/rights (via music metadata) to actual income for musicians. But it should be defined, mandated and enforced by a standards body with representation from a range of interested parties – not just by Google alone. With a technical infrastructure, creative ownership carries real meaning and brings real money to creators. The telephone industry did this. The software industry did this. The music industry can do this. I know there is work being done on standardizing metadata and creating APIs, but it seems to many to be slow and not inclusive of many actual musicians (many of whom, like Keating, are also programmers). Perhaps Google could exhibit technical leadership here instead of being heavy handed in the licensing with creatives like Zoe Keating who just want to make a living. More coding, less lawyers.

  5. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 | PlayPh

  6. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 - Mail Slice | Mail Slice

  7. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 - teqarazzi

  8. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 | insurance

  9. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 | ZeAffiliate.com

  10. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080

  11. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 | Taiwan NO 01

  12. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 | Printing Jersey

  13. Pingback: Start up: web design for 2015, Nexus 6’s long slipway, hacking journalism under threat?, Zoë Keating v YouTube redux, and more | The Overspill: when there's more that I want to say

  14. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4080 - Engadget - Ad Hoc Dance Bands & Wedding Music

  15. Pingback: 'YOUTUBE is EVIL': Somebody had a tape running, Google... | Software , Mobile apps

  16. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | My Power Health

  17. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | SKYSOFT ADVERTISER

  18. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | The Muslim Contributors Backlinks Domain

  19. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | TRIBRATANEWS JATIM – TERPOPULERTRIBRATANEWS JATIM - TERPOPULER

  20. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | 9-HZ TRIBRATANEWS BACKLINKS SUPPORT9-HZ TRIBRATANEWS BACKLINKS SUPPORT

  21. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | Super Deal Shopper

  22. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | TECHNO VISION ASIA

  23. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | My WordPress Website

  24. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | News Devine Properties

  25. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | Amvet Wireless

  26. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | pop.north-hotel.info

  27. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 — Cath News India

  28. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | Daily_V

  29. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 « TRIBRATANEWS PREMIUM BACKLINKS

  30. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | TRIBRATANEWS POLDA KALSEL

  31. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | New Course Biz

  32. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 « Pagemark Bangladesh Advretiser

  33. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 - Ask a Question and Get Answer Frequently Asked Questions

  34. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | BACKLINK BUILD TRIBRATANEWS JATIM COMMUNITY

  35. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | north-hotel.info

  36. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | LSI – Advertiser Premium

  37. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | BACKLINK CHECK HIGH PR DOMAIN

  38. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | Fashion Style

  39. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | Webelimde

  40. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | Poker PTC Info

  41. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080

  42. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | LB‘s Blog

  43. Pingback: Cellist disagrees with YouTube Music Key over rule #4,080 | Article Showcase

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s