The IFPI Confirms 2019 was the Independents’ Year for Streaming

UPDATE: this post has been updated to correct an erroneous data point. Previously it stated that independent market share was 41%. It has been corrected to 29%

Recently I wrote about how a little-known Spotify statistic revealed that independents (labels and artists) outperformed the majors on its platform in 2019. The IFPI’s latest global revenue estimates provide further evidence of 2019 being a stellar streaming year for independents. As we have two sets of fixed reported figures (major label reports, and the artists direct sector reported by MIDiA) we can simply deduct these figures from the IFPI’s streaming figures to reveal what the IFPI estimates independent label revenues to be. The tl;dr: Independents grew by 39% while majors grew by 22%, which means that the independents’ global share of streaming revenue increased by two whole points from 27% to 29%.

ifpi midia 2020 streaming

The IFPI reported global streaming revenues of $11.2 billion, however these figures include YouTube but not Pandora ad supported revenues. So, to match up the IFPI’s definition with how the record labels report the revenue we need to add in Pandora ad revenue which takes us to $11.9 billion which is almost exactly what MIDiA reported two months ago.

Although independent labels and artists grew fastest in relative terms in 2019, the majors grew most in absolute terms, adding nearly twice as much net new revenue ($1.5 billion compared to $0.8 billion). The majors remain the powerhouse of the streaming economy but independents are rapidly making this space their own. If they were to add another four or five points of share across 2020 and in 2021, then independents would be represent a third of the entire streaming market. But a crucial consideration is that these figures are on a distribution basis, so the major revenue includes independents they distribute. According to the last WIN study, the independent market share went up another c12%. On that basis, by 2021, the independent label share of streaming could be approaching 50%. That would be a genuine paradigm shift, the clear announcement of a newly aligned music business.

Soon we’ll be writing on how the majors can turn this around. Watch this space.

14 thoughts on “The IFPI Confirms 2019 was the Independents’ Year for Streaming

  1. Pingback: Indie Artists, Labels Outperform Majors On Streaming Platforms [MARK MULLIGAN] - SMTM RECORDS

  2. Pingback: Indie Artists, Labels Outperform Majors On Streaming Platforms [MARK MULLIGAN] – I.G.C Music

  3. Don’t write about how the majors can turn it around. This is a great thing. Let them do their own dirty work research. Guarantee their methods won’t be good for the music or the artists and just for their pocketbooks.

  4. Pingback: How Spotify Is Focused on Playlisting More Emerging Independent Acts During the Pandemic | Billboard

  5. Pingback: How Spotify Is Focused on Playlisting More Emerging Independent Acts During the Pandemic – MusicAroundWorldFAN

  6. Pingback: How Spotify Is Focused on Playlisting More Emerging Independent Acts During the Pandemic - SMTM RECORDS

  7. Pingback: How Spotify Is Focused on Playlisting More Emerging Independent Acts During the Pandemic

  8. Pingback: Phoebe Bridgers Launches Saddest Factory Label With Dead Oceans: Exclusive | Music Industry Wire

  9. Pingback: Phoebe Bridgers Launches Saddest Factory Label With Dead Oceans: Exclusive

  10. Pingback: Phoebe Bridgers Launches Saddest Factory Label With Dead Oceans: Exclusive | Celebilicious

  11. Pingback: Phoebe Bridgers Launches Saddest Factory Label With Dead Oceans: Exclusive | Look

  12. Pingback: Phoebe Bridgers Launches Saddest Factory Label With Dead Oceans: Exclusive - Supply Chain Council of European Union | Scceu.org

  13. Pingback: Phoebe Bridgers lanza la marca de fábrica más triste con Dead Oceans: exclusivo – musicalatina

Leave a comment